![robert plutchik robert plutchik](https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/emotion-wheel-share.jpg)
This model suggests that emotions are distributed in a two-dimensional circular space, containing arousal and valence dimensions. The circumplex model of emotion was developed by James Russell. Circumplex model Circumplex model of emotion has two axes: Valence and Arousal The two-dimensional models that are most prominent are the circumplex model, the vector model, and the Positive Activation – Negative Activation (PANA) model. Several dimensional models of emotion have been developed, though there are just a few that remain as the dominant models currently accepted by most. These models contrast theories of basic emotion, which propose that different emotions arise from separate neural systems. Dimensional models of emotion suggest that a common and interconnected neurophysiological system is responsible for all affective states. Most dimensional models incorporate valence and arousal or intensity dimensions. ĭimensional models of emotion attempt to conceptualize human emotions by defining where they lie in two or three dimensions. In 1954, Harold Schlosberg named three dimensions of emotion: "pleasantness–unpleasantness", "attention–rejection" and "level of activation". In 1897, Wilhelm Max Wundt, the father of modern psychology, proposed that emotions can be described by three dimensions: "pleasurable versus unpleasurable", "arousing or subduing", and "strain or relaxation".
![robert plutchik robert plutchik](https://www.weblyzard.com/data/sites/21/emotion-frameworks.png)
In his philosophical treatise, The Passions of the Soul, Descartes defines and investigates the six primary passions ( Wonder, love, hate, desire, joy, and sadness). Dimensional models of emotion įor both theoretical and practical reasons researchers define emotions according to one or more dimensions. A theme common to many constructionist theories is that different emotions do not have specific locations in the nervous system or distinct physiological signatures, and that context is central to the emotion a person feels because of the accessibility of different concepts afforded by different contexts. Two hypothesized ingredients are "core affect" (characterized by, e.g., hedonic valence and physiological arousal) and conceptual knowledge (such as the semantic meaning of the emotion labels themselves, e.g., the word "anger").
![robert plutchik robert plutchik](https://thecarbonfreezecom.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/plutchiks-wheel-of-emotions-with-basic-emotions-and-derivative-emotions-and-cone-like.png)
On "constructionist" accounts, the emotion a person feels in response to a stimulus or event is "constructed" from more elemental biological and psychological ingredients. Furthermore, knowledge of what the person is seeing or the larger context of the eliciting event should not be necessary to deduce what the person is feeling from observing the biological signatures. A theme common to many basic emotions theories is that there should be functional signatures that distinguish different emotions: we should be able to tell what emotion a person is feeling by looking at his or her brain activity and/or physiology. In particular, the function, expression, and meaning of different emotions are hypothesized to be biologically distinct from one another. On "basic emotion" accounts, activation of an emotion, such as anger, sadness, or fear, is "triggered" by the brain's appraisal of a stimulus or event with respect to the perceiver's goals or survival. There has been recent discussion of the progression on the different views of emotion over the years. However, a debate among experts has questioned this understanding of what emotions are. This apparent ease of recognition has led to the identification of a number of emotions that are said to be basic, and universal among all people. Humans' subjective experience is that emotions are clearly recognizable in ourselves and others. Each emotion acts as a discrete category rather than an individual emotional state. Ekman explains that there are particular characteristics attached to each of these emotions, allowing them to be expressed in varying degrees in a non-verbal manner. A popular example is Paul Ekman and his colleagues' cross-cultural study of 1992, in which they concluded that the six basic emotions are anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. Theorists have conducted studies to determine which emotions are basic. These basic emotions are described as "discrete" because they are believed to be distinguishable by an individual's facial expression and biological processes. In discrete emotion theory, all humans are thought to have an innate set of basic emotions that are cross-culturally recognizable.
![robert plutchik robert plutchik](https://images.fineartamerica.com/images/artworkimages/mediumlarge/3/plutchiks-wheel-of-emotions-zapista-ou.jpg)
Emotion classification, the means by which one may distinguish or contrast one emotion from another, is a contested issue in emotion research and in affective science.